Believing Others: Pros and Cons
From TrustLet, a free, collaborative project for collecting and analyzing information about trust metrics.
Believing others: pro and cons [1] is a paper which proves that it is possible to spot out selfish agents if reciprocative agents share their "opinions" (i.e. make them public) about other agents.
[edit] Abstract
In open environments there is no central control over agent behaviors. On the contrary, agents in such systems can be assumed to be primarily driven by self interests. Under the assumption that agents remain in the system for significant time periods, or that the agent composition changes only slowly, we have previously presented a prescriptive strategy for promoting and sustaining cooperation among self-interested agents. The adaptive, probabilistic policy we have prescribed promotes reciprocative cooperation that improves both individual and group performance in the long run. In the short run, however, selfish agents could still exploit reciprocative agents. In this paper, we evaluate the hypothesis that the exploitative tendencies of selfish agents can be effectively curbed if reciprocative agents share their "opinions" of other agents. Since the true nature of agents are not known a priori and is learned from experience, believing others can also pose other hazards. We provide a learned trust-based evaluation function that is shown to resist both individual and concerted deception on the part of selfish agents.
[edit] References
- ↑ Sen, S.; Biswas, A.; Debnath, S. (2000). "Believing others: pro and cons (link)". MultiAgent Systems, 2000. Proceedings. Fourth International Conference on: 279-285.
